Paper detail

The MOSDEF Survey: Dynamical and Baryonic Masses and Kinematic Structures of Star-Forming Galaxies at $1.4 \leq z \leq 2.6$

We present H$α$ gas kinematics for 178 star-forming galaxies at z~2 from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field survey. We have developed models to interpret the kinematic measurements from fixed-angle multi-object spectroscopy, using structural parameters derived from CANDELS HST/F160W imaging. For 35 galaxies we measure resolved rotation with a median $(V/σ_{V,0})_{R_E}=2.1$. We derive dynamical masses from the kinematics and sizes and compare them to baryonic masses, with gas masses estimated from dust-corrected H$α$ star formation rates (SFRs) and the Kennicutt-Schmidt relation. When assuming that galaxies with and without observed rotation have the same median $(V/σ_{V,0})_{R_E}$, we find good agreement between the dynamical and baryonic masses, with a scatter of $σ_{RMS}=0.34$dex and a median offset of $Δ\log_{10}M=0.04$dex. This comparison implies a low dark matter fraction (8% within an effective radius) for a Chabrier initial mass function (IMF), and disfavors a Salpeter IMF. Moreover, the requirement that $M_{dyn}/M_{baryon}$ should be independent of inclination yields a median value of $(V/σ_{V,0})_{R_E}=2.1$ for galaxies without observed rotation. If instead we treat the galaxies without detected rotation as early-type galaxies, the masses are also in reasonable agreement ($Δ\log_{10}M=-0.07$dex, $σ_{RMS}=0.37$dex). The inclusion of gas masses is critical in this comparison; if gas masses are excluded there is an increasing trend of $M_{dyn}/M_{*}$ with higher specific SFR (SSFR). Furthermore, we find indications that $V/σ$ decreases with increasing H$α$ SSFR for our full sample, which may reflect disk settling. We also study the Tully-Fisher relation and find that at fixed stellar mass $S_{0.5}=(0.5V_{2.2}^2+σ_{V,0}^2)^{1/2}$ was higher at earlier times. At fixed baryonic mass, we observe the opposite trend. [abridged]

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access14 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.