Paper detail

The MOSDEF Survey: Dissecting the star-formation rate vs. stellar mass relation using H$α$ and H$β$ emission lines at z ~ 2

We present results on the star-formation rate (SFR) versus stellar mass ($M_*$) relation (i.e., the "main sequence") among star-forming galaxies at 1.37$\leq$$z$$\leq$2.61 using the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) survey. Based on a sample of 261 galaxies with H$α$ and H$β$ spectroscopy, we have estimated robust dust-corrected instantaneous SFRs over a large range in $M_*$ ($\sim10^{9.5}-10^{11.5}M_\odot$). We find a correlation between log(SFR(H$α$)) and log($M_*$) with a slope of 0.65$\pm$0.08 (0.58$\pm$0.10) at 1.4<z<2.6 (2.1<z<2.6). We find that different assumptions for the dust correction, such as using the color-excess of the stellar continuum to correct the nebular lines, sample selection biases against red star-forming galaxies, and not accounting for Balmer absorption can yield steeper slopes of the log(SFR)-log($M_*$) relation. Our sample is immune from these biases as it is rest-frame optically selected, H$α$ and H$β$ are corrected for Balmer absorption, and the H$α$ luminosity is dust-corrected using the nebular color-excess computed from the Balmer decrement. The scatter of the log(SFR(H$α$))-log($M_*$) relation, after accounting for the measurement uncertainties, is 0.31 dex at 2.1<z<2.6, which is 0.05 dex larger than the scatter in log(SFR(UV))-log($M_*$). Based on comparisons to a simulated SFR-$M_*$ relation with some intrinsic scatter, we argue that in the absence of direct measurements of galaxy-to-galaxy variations in the attenuation/extinction curves and the IMF, one cannot use the difference in the scatter of the SFR(H$α$)- and SFR(UV)-$M_*$ relations to constrain the stochasticity of star formation in high-redshift galaxies.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.