Paper detail

The Morphology-Density relationship in 1<z<2 clusters

The morphology-density relationship states that dense cosmic environments such as galaxy clusters have an overabundance of quiescent elliptical galaxies, but it is unclear at which redshift this relationship is first established. We study the morphology of 4 clusters with $1.2<z<1.8$ using HST imaging and the morphology computation code statmorph. By comparing median morphology of cluster galaxies to CANDELS field galaxies using Monte Carlo analysis, we find that 2 out of 4 clusters (at z=1.19 and z=1.75) have an established morphology-density relationship with more than $3σ$ significance. $\sim$50% of galaxies in these clusters are bulge-dominated compared to $\sim$30% in the field, and they are significantly more compact. This result is more significant for low-mass galaxies with $\log M/M_\odot \lessapprox 10.5$, showing that low-mass galaxies are affected the most in clusters. We also find an intriguing system of two z $\approx$ 1.45 clusters at a unusually small separation 2D separation of $3&#39;$ and 3D separation of $\approx73$ Mpc that exhibit no morphology-density relationship but have enhanced merger signatures. We conclude that the environmental mechanism responsible for the morphology-density relationship is 1) already active as early as z=1.75, 2) forms compact, bulge-dominated galaxies and 3) affects primarily low-mass galaxies. However, there is a significant degree of intracluster variance that may depend on the larger cosmological environment in which the cluster is embedded.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.