Paper detail

The morphology and luminosity function of the Galactic bulge from TMGS star counts

The bulge of the Galaxy is analysed by inverting K-band star counts from the Two-Micron Galactic Survey in a number of off-plane regions. A total area of about 75 square degrees of sky is analysed. Assuming a non-variable luminosity function within the bulge, we derive the top end of the K-band luminosity function and the stellar density function, whose morphology is fitted to triaxial ellipsoids. The luminosity function shows a sharp decrease brighter than $M_K=-8.0$ when compared with the disc population. By fitting ellipsoids, we find that the bulge is triaxial with the major axis in the plane at an angle with line of sight to the Galactic centre of $12^\circ$ in the first quadrant. The axial ratios are $1:0.54:0.33$ and the distance of the Sun from the centre of the triaxial ellipsoid is 7860 pc. The best fit for the stellar density, assuming an ellipsoidal distribution, is $D(t)=1.17(t/2180)^{-1.8}\exp(- (t/2180)^{1.8}) stars pc^{-3}$, for $1300<t<3000$, where $t$ is the distance along the major axis of the ellipsoid in parsecs.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.