Paper detail

The morphological mix of field galaxies to I=24.25 magnitudes (b=26 magnitudes) from a deep Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 image

We determine the morphological mix of field galaxies down to $m_{I}\simeq 24.25$ mag ($m_{B}\sim 26.0$ mag) from a single ultradeep HST WFPC2 image in both the $V_{606}$ and $I_{814}$ filters. In total, we find 227 objects with $m_{I}\le 24.5$ mag and classify these into three types: ellipticals (16%), early-type spirals (37%) and late-type spirals/Irregulars (47%). The differential number counts for each type are compared to simple models in a standard flat cosmology. We find that both the elliptical and early-type spiral number counts are well described by {\it little or no}-evolution models, but only when normalized at $b_{J} = 18.0$ mag. Given the uncertainties in the luminosity function (LF) normalization, both populations are consistent with a mild evolutionary scenario based on a normal/low rate of star-formation. This constrains the end of the last {\it major} star-formation epoch in the giant galaxy populations to $z\geq 0.8$. Conversely, the density of the observed late-type/Irregular population is found to be a factor of 10 in excess of the conventional no-evolution model. This large population might be explained by either a modified {\it local} dwarf-rich LF, and/or strong evolution acting on the {\it local} LF. For the dwarf-rich case, a {\it steep} faint-end Schechter-slope ($α\simeq -1.8$) is required plus a five-fold increase in the dwarf normalization. For a purely evolving model based on a {\it flat} Loveday {\it et al.} (1992) LF ($α\simeq -1.0$), a ubiquitous starburst of $ΔI\sim$2.0 mag is needed at z$\simeq 0.5$ for the {\it entire} late-type population. We argue for a combination of these possibilities, and show that for a steep Marzke {\it et al.} (1994) LF ($α\simeq -1.5$), a starburst of $\sim$ 1.3 mag is required

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.