Paper detail

The morphological identification of the rapidly evolving population of faint galaxies

The excess numbers of blue galaxies at faint magnitudes are a long-standing cosmological puzzle. We present new number-magnitude counts as a function of galactic morphology from the first deep fields of the Cycle 4 Hubble Space Telescope {\it Medium Deep Survey} project. From a sample of 301 galaxies we define counts for elliptical, spiral and irregular/peculiar galaxies to $I=22$. We find two principal results. Firstly the elliptical and spiral galaxy counts both follow the predictions of high-normalisation no-evolution models at all magnitudes, indicating that regular Hubble types evolve only slowly to $z\sim 0.5$. Secondly we find that irregular/peculiar galaxies, including multiple-peaked, possibly merging, objects, have a very steep number-magnitude relation and greatly exceed predictions based on proportions in local surveys. These systems make up half the total counts by $I=22$ and imply the rapidly-evolving component of the faint galaxy population has been identified.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.