Paper detail

The MMI Decoder is Asymptotically Optimal for the Typical Random Code and for the Expurgated Code

We provide two results concerning the optimality of the maximum mutual information (MMI) decoder. First, we prove that the error exponents of the typical random codes under the optimal maximum likelihood (ML) decoder and the MMI decoder are equal. As a corollary to this result, we also show that the error exponents of the expurgated codes under the ML and the MMI decoders are equal. These results strengthen the well known result due to Csiszár and Körner, according to which, these decoders achieve equal random coding error exponents, since the error exponents of the typical random code and the expurgated code are strictly higher than the random coding error exponents, at least at low coding rates. While the universal optimality of the MMI decoder, in the random-coding error exponent sense, is easily proven by commuting the expectation over the channel noise and the expectation over the ensemble, when it comes to typical and expurgated exponents, this commutation can no longer be carried out. Therefore, the proof of the universal optimality of the MMI decoder must be completely different and it turns out to be highly non-trivial.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.