Paper detail

The (minimum) rank of typical fooling set matrices

A fooling-set matrix has nonzero diagonal, but at least one in every pair of diagonally opposite entries is 0. Dietzfelbinger et al. '96 proved that the rank of such a matrix is at least $\sqrt n$. It is known that the bound is tight (up to a multiplicative constant). We ask for the "typical" minimum rank of a fooling-set matrix: For a fooling-set zero-nonzero pattern chosen at random, is the minimum rank of a matrix with that zero-nonzero pattern over a field $\mathbb F$ closer to its lower bound $\sqrt{n}$ or to its upper bound $n$? We study random patterns with a given density $p$, and prove an $Ω(n)$ bound for the cases when: (a) $p$ tends to $0$ quickly enough, (b) $p$ tends to $0$ slowly, and $|\mathbb F|=O(1)$, (c) $p\in(0,1]$ is a constant. We have to leave open the case when $p\to 0$ slowly and $\mathbb F$ is a large or infinite field (e.g., $\mathbb F=GF(2^n)$, $F=\mathbb{R}$).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.