The minimum number of clique-saturating edges

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let GG be a KpK_p-free graph. We say ee is a KpK_p-saturating edge of GG if e∉E(G)e\notin E(G) and G+eG+e contains a copy of KpK_p. Denote by fp(n,e)f_p(n, e) the minimum number of KpK_p-saturating edges that an nn-vertex KpK_p-free graph with ee edges can have. Erdős and Tuza conjectured that f4(n,⌊n2/4⌋+1)=(1+o(1))n216.f_4(n,\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+1)=\left(1 + o(1)\right)\frac{n^2}{16}. Balogh and Liu disproved this by showing f4(n,⌊n2/4⌋+1)=(1+o(1))2n233f_4(n,\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+1)=(1+o(1))\frac{2n^2}{33}. They believed that a natural generalization of their construction for KpK_p-free graph should also be optimal and made a conjecture that fp+1(n,ex(n,Kp)+1)=(2(p−2)2p(4p2−11p+8)+o(1))n2f_{p+1}(n,ex(n,K_p)+1)=\left(\frac{2(p-2)^2}{p(4p^2-11p+8)}+o(1)\right)n^2 for all integers p≥3p\ge 3. The main result of this paper is to confirm the above conjecture of Balogh and Liu.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.