Paper detail

The MiniBooNE anomaly and heavy neutrino decay

The anomaly in the low energy distribution of quasi-elastic neutrino events reported by the MiniBooNE collaboration is discussed. We show that the observed excess of electron-like events could originate from the production and decay of a heavy neutrino ($ν_h$) in the MiniBooNE detector. The $ν_h$ is created by mixing in $ν_μ$ neutral-current interactions and decays radiatively into $ νγ$ due to a transition magnetic moment between the $ν_h$ and a light neutrino $ν$. The energy measured in the detector arises from the subsequent conversion of the decay photon into a $\pair$ pair within the detector volume. The analysis of the energy and angular distributions of the excess events suggests that the $ν_h$ has a mass around 500 MeV and the lifetime $τ_{ν_h} \lesssim 10^{-9}$ s. Existing experimental data are found to be consistent with a mixing strength between the $ν_h$ and the $ν_μ$ of $|U_{μh}|^2 \simeq (1-4)\times 10^{-3}$ and a $ν_h$ transition magnetic moment of $ μ_{tr} \simeq (1- 6)\times 10^{-9} μ_B$. Finally, we discuss the reason why no significant excess of low energy events has been observed in the recent antineutrino data.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.