Paper detail

The Milky Way, The Local Galaxies \& the IR Tully-Fisher Relation

Using the near infrared fluxes of local galaxies derived from COBE/DIRBE J(1.25 $μ$m) K (2.2 $μ$m) \& L (3.5 $μ$m) band maps and published Cepheid distances, we construct Tully-Fisher (TF) diagrams for the nearby galaxies. The measured dispersions in these luminosity-linewidth diagrams are remarkably small: $σ_J = 0.09$ magnitudes, $σ_K = 0.13$ magnitudes, and $σ_L = 0.20$ magnitudes. For the J and K bands, Monte Carlo simulations give a 95\% confidence interval upper limit on the true scatter in the T-F diagram of $σ_J \le 0.35$ and $σ_K \le 0.45$. We determine Milky Way's luminosity and place it in the T-F diagram by fitting a bar plus ``standard'' values of its size and circular speed (Sun-Galactic center distance $R_0 = 8.5 \kpc$ and $Θ_0 =220 \kms$), the Milky Way lies within $1.5 σ$ of the TF relations. We can use the TF relation and the Cepheid distances to nearby bright galaxies to constrain $R_0$ and $Θ_0$. Alternatively, we can fix the parameters of the Galaxy to their standard values, ignore the Cepheid zero-point, and use the Tully-Fisher relation to determine the Hubble Constant directly: $H_0 = 66 \pm 12$ km/s/Mpc.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.