Paper detail

The Milky Way satellite velocity function is a sharp probe of small-scale structure problems

Twenty years ago, the mismatch between the observed number of Milky Way satellite galaxies and the predicted number of cold dark matter (CDM) subhalos was dubbed the ``missing satellites problem". Although mostly framed since in terms of satellite counts in luminosity space, the missing satellites problem was originally posed in velocity space. Importantly, the stellar velocity dispersion function encodes information about the density profile of satellites as well as their abundance. In this work, we completeness correct the MW satellite stellar velocity dispersion function down to its ultrafaint dwarfs ($L \gtrsim 340$ L$_\odot$). Our most conservative completeness correction is in good agreement with a simple CDM model in which massive, classical satellites (M$_{\rm 200} \gtrsim 5 \times 10^8~$M$_\odot$) have baryon-driven cores, while lower mass, ultrafaint satellites inhabit cuspy halos that are not strongly tidally stripped. Tidal destruction of satellites by the MW's disk must be minimal, otherwise the completeness-corrected velocity function exceeds any plausible CDM prediction -- a ``too many satellites" problem. We rule out non-core-collapsing self-interacting dark matter models with a constant cross section $\gtrsim$ 0.1 cm$^2$/g. Constraints on warm dark matter are stronger than those based on the luminosity function due to its additional sensitivity to subhalo central densities, which suppresses number counts by up to an additional 30%. A thermal relic mass $\gtrsim$ 6 keV is preferred. Reducing uncertainties on stellar velocity dispersion measurements and the amount of tidal stripping experienced by the faintest dwarfs is key to determining the severity of the too many satellites problem.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.