Paper detail

The Milky Way's Fermi Bubbles: Echoes of the Last Quasar Outburst?

{\it Fermi}-LAT has recently detected two gamma ray bubbles disposed symmetrically with respect to the Galactic plane. The bubbles have been suggested to be in a quasi-steady state, inflated by ongoing star formation over the age of the Galaxy. Here we propose an alternative picture where the bubbles are the remnants of a large-scale wide-angle outflow from \sgra, the SMBH of our Galaxy. Such an outflow would be a natural consequence of a short but bright accretion event on to \sgra\ if it happened concurrently with the well known star formation event in the inner 0.5 pc of the Milky Way $\sim 6$ Myr ago. We find that the hypothesised near-spherical outflow is focussed into a pair of symmetrical lobes by the greater gas pressure along the Galactic plane. The outflow shocks against the interstellar gas in the Galaxy bulge. Gamma--ray emission could be powered by cosmic rays created by either \sgra\ directly or accelerated in the shocks with the external medium. The Galaxy disc remains unaffected, agreeing with recent observational evidence that supermassive black holes do not correlate with galaxy disc properties. We estimate that an accreted mass $\sim 2 \times 10^3\msun$ is needed for the accretion event to power the observed {\it Fermi}--LAT lobes. Within a factor of a few this agrees with the mass of the young stars born during the star formation event. This estimate suggests that roughly 50% of the gas was turned into stars, while the rest accreted onto \sgra. One interpretation of this is a reduced star formation efficiency inside the \sgra\ accretion disc due to stellar feedback, and the other a peculiar mass deposition geometry that resulted in a significant amount of gas falling directly inside the inner $\sim 0.03$ pc of the Galaxy.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.