Paper detail

The Midpoint Mixed Model with a Missingness Mechanism (M5): A Likelihood-Based Framework for Quantification of Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Data (Preprint)

Statistical models for proteomics data often estimate protein fold changes between two samples, A and B, as the average peptide intensity from sample A divided by the average peptide intensity from sample B. Such average intensity ratios fail to take full advantage of the experimental design which eliminates unseen confounding variables by processing peptides from both samples under identical conditions. Typically this structure is exploited through the estimation of a protein ratio as the median ratio of matched peptide intensities. This simple solution fails to account for a substantial missing data bias which has led to the development of more sophisticated average intensity models. Here we develop the first statistical model that accounts for nonignorable missingness while utilizing peptide level matched pairs across samples. Our simulation analysis shows that models which fail to utilize peptide level ratios, su.er astonishing losses to accuracy with basic ANOVA estimates having an average MSE 371% higher than median ratio estimates. In turn, median ratio estimates have an average MSE 35% higher than our model estimates. An analysis of breast cancer data reinforces these relationships and shows that our model is capable of increasing the number of proteins estimated by 22%.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.