Paper detail

The mid-infrared extinction in molecular clouds Case study of B 335

The purpose of the investigation is to probe the dust properties inside a molecular cloud, how particle grow and how the presence of ice coatings may change the overall shape of the extinction curve. Field stars can be used to probe the cloud extinction. By combining multi-colour photometry and IR spectroscopy the spectral class of the star can be determined as can the extinction curve. We determine the reddening curve from 0.35 to 24 μm. The water ice band at 3.1 μm is weaker (τ(3.1) = 0.4) than expected from the cloud extinction (AV \approx 10 for the sightline to the most obscured star). On the other hand, the CO ice band at 4.7 μm is strong (τ(4.67) = 0.7) and indicates, that the mass column density of frozen CO is about the same as that of water ice. We show that the reddening curves for the two background stars, for which the silicate band has been measured, can be accurately modelled from the UV to 24 μm. These models only include graphite and silicate grains. No need for any additional major grain component to explain the slow decline of the reddening curve beyond the K band. The dust model for the dense part of the cloud has more large grains than for the rim. We propose that the well established shallow reddening curve beyond the K band has two different explanations: larger graphite grains in dense regions and relatively small grains in the diffuse ISM, giving rise to substantially less extinction beyond the K band than previously thought. For the sight line towards the most obscured star, we derive the relation AKs = 0.97 \cdot E(J - Ks), and assuming that all silicon is bound in silicates, N(2 H2 +H) \approx 1.5 \times 10^{21} \cdot AV \approx 9 \times 10^{21} \cdot AKs. For the rim of the cloud we get AKs = 0.51 \cdot E(J - Ks), which is close to recent determinations for the diffuse ISM. The corresponding gas column density is N(2 H2 +H) \approx 2.3 \times 10^{21} \cdot AV \approx 3 \times 10^{22} \cdot AKs.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.