Paper detail

The metric dimension of small distance-regular and strongly regular graphs

A {\em resolving set} for a graph $Γ$ is a collection of vertices $S$, chosen so that for each vertex $v$, the list of distances from $v$ to the members of $S$ uniquely specifies $v$. The {\em metric dimension} of $Γ$ is the smallest size of a resolving set for $Γ$. A graph is {\em distance-regular} if, for any two vertices $u,v$ at each distance $i$, the number of neighbours of $v$ at each possible distance from $u$ (i.e. $i-1$, $i$ or $i+1$) depends only on the distance $i$, and not on the choice of vertices $u,v$. The class of distance-regular graphs includes all distance-transitive graphs and all strongly regular graphs. In this paper, we present the results of computer calculations which have found the metric dimension of all distance-regular graphs on up to 34 vertices, low-valency distance transitive graphs on up to 100 vertices, strongly regular graphs on up to 45 vertices, rank-$3$ strongly regular graphs on under 100 vertices, as well as certain other distance-regular graphs.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.