Paper detail

The Method of Conditional Expectations for PAPR and Cubic Metric Reduction

The OFDM waveform exhibits high fluctuation in the signal envelope which causes distortion in the nonlinear power amplifier of the transmitter. Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR) and Cubic Metric (CM) are the common metrics to quantify the phenomenon. A promising approach for PAPR or CM reduction is Sign Selection which is based on altering the signs of the data symbols. In this paper, the Method of Conditional Expectations (CE Method) is proposed to obtain a competing suboptimal solution to the Sign Selection problem. For PAPR reduction, a surrogate metric is introduced which allows for an efficient application of the CE Method. For CM reduction, the tractability of the definition of CM is exploited to this end. The algorithm is analyzed to obtain an upper bound on the worst-case reduced metric value. A noticeable characteristic is the persistent reduction capability for a wide range of subcarrier numbers. In particular, simulations show a reduction of the so-called "effective PAPR" to about 6.5 dB from 10.5 dB and 11.7 dB respectively for 64 to 1024 subcarriers. A similar steady reduction of 3 dB is observed for CM. In addition, the CE Method leads to a pruned version of Sign Selection which halves the rate loss.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.