Paper detail

The metallicity bimodality of globular cluster systems: a test of galaxy assembly and of the evolution of the galaxy mass-metallicity relation

(Abridged) We build a theoretical model to study the origin of the globular cluster metallicity bimodality in the hierarchical galaxy assembly scenario, based on the observed galaxy mass-[O/H] relation and the galaxy stellar mass function up to z ~4, and on theoretical merger rates. We derive a new galaxy [Fe/H]-M(star) relation as a function of z, and by assuming that GCs share the metallicity of their parent galaxy when they form, we populate the merger tree with GCs. We perform a series of Monte-Carlo simulations of the galaxy assembly, and study the properties of the final GC population as a function of galaxy mass, assembly and star formation history, and under different assumptions for the evolution of the galaxy mass-[Fe/H] relation. The main results are: 1) The hierarchical clustering scenario naturally predicts a metallicity bimodality in the galaxy GC population: the metal-rich GCs are formed in the galaxy main progenitor around z~2, and the metal-poor GCs are accreted from satellites and formed at z~3-4. 2) The model reproduces the observed relations for the metallicity of the metal-rich and metal-poor GCs as a function of galaxy mass. The positions of the metal-poor and metal-rich peaks depend exclusively on the evolution of the galaxy mass-[Fe/H] relation and the [O/Fe], both of which can be constrained by this method. We find that the galaxy [O/Fe] evolves linearly with z from a value of ~0.5 at z~4 to a value of ~0.1 at z=0. 3) Given a galaxy mass, the relative strength of the metal-rich and metal-poor peaks depends exclusively on the galaxy assembly and star formation history: galaxies in denser environments and/or early types galaxies show a larger fraction of metal-poor GCs, while galaxies with a sparse merger history and/or late type galaxies are dominated by metal-rich GCs. 4) The GC metallicity bimodality disappears for galaxy masses below M(star)~1e9, and for z>2.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.