Paper detail

The Merging History of the Milky Way

The age distribution, and chemical elemental abundances, of stars in the halo of the Milky Way provide constraints on theories of galaxy formation. As one specific example, the accretion of satellite galaxies similar to the present retinue of dwarf spheroidals (dSphs) would provide an observable metal-poor, intermediate-age population. This paper presents a quantitative assessment of any contribution made by such stars to the stellar halo. The bulk of the stellar populations in the halo show a well-defined turn-off, at B-V ~ 0.4, implying that the vast majority of the stars are old. The fraction of stars which lie blueward of this well-defined turn-off, with metallicities similar to that of the present dSphs, is used in this paper to place limits on the importance of the recent accretion of such systems. Very few (< ~ 10%) stars are found to be bluer (and by implication, younger) than this limit, with the highest value found for the more metal-rich halo ([Fe/H] >~ -1.5 dex). Direct comparison of this statistic with the colour distribution of the turnoff stars in the Carina dwarf allows us to derive an upper limit on the number of mergers of such satellite galaxies into the halo of the Milky Way. This upper limit is ~ 40 Carina-like galaxies. The higher metallicity data constrain satellite galaxies like the Fornax dwarf; only <~ 5 of these could have been accreted within the last < ~ 10 Gyr. We note that the low star-formation rates inferred for dSphs predict distinctive elemental abundance signatures; future data for field halo stars, including candidate younger stars, will provide a further robust test of accretion models.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.