Paper detail

The mechanics of the $\textit{Less In More Out}$ artificial heart: modeling fabric-based soft robotic devices

Recently, the Less In More Out device, a fluidically actuated soft total artificial heart was proposed. This device uses arrays of pouch motors to achieve a positive fluidic lever when pneumatically actuated against physiological hemodynamic conditions. Extensive experimental characterization demonstrated its potential; however, experiments alone cannot resolve the internal mechanical fields that govern device durability and performance. Here, we develop a computational framework to investigate intrinsic device mechanics, such as stress concentrations, strain paths, and fatigue life, and to explore targeted design modifications that improve durability and efficiency. We show that our model reproduces the nonlinear deformation and pressure-volume relationships measured experimentally under varying hemodynamic conditions. Across designs, devices with fewer pouches deliver higher stroke volumes but exhibit up to 50% higher peak von Mises stresses, which reduces their fatigue life. Our simulations further identify heat-sealed seams and buckling regions as durability-limiting features. As a proof of concept, we vary the valve support aspect ratio and relative endocardial-epicardial pouch fabric compliance, reducing the peak von Mises stress by ~10% while maintaining identical physiological outputs and improving mechanical efficiency. Overall, our framework enables detailed evaluation of stress hotspots, buckling, and fatigue life, and offers a foundation for optimizing artificial hearts and other fluidically actuated fabric-based soft robotic devices.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.