Paper detail

The Mean Field Fokker-Planck Equation with Nonlinear No-flux Boundary Conditions

We consider the mean field Fokker-Planck equation subject to nonlinear no-flux boundary conditions, which necessarily arise when subjecting a system of Brownian particles interacting via a pair potential in a bounded domain. With the additional presence of an external potential $V_1$, we show, by analysing the linearised Fokker-Planck operator, that the spectral properties of the equilibrium densities can differ considerably when compared with previous studies, e.g., with periodic boundary conditions. Amongst other mean field models of complex many-body particle systems, we present numerical experiments encompassing in a wide range of physical applications, including: generalised exponential models (Gaussian, Morse); a Kuramoto model, for noisy coupled oscillators; and an Onsager model for liquid crystals. We showcase our results by using the numerical methods developed in the pseudospectral collocation scheme 2DChebClass.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.