Paper detail

The Matter Bispectrum in N-body Simulations with non-Gaussian Initial Conditions

We present measurements of the dark matter bispectrum in N-body simulations with non-Gaussian initial conditions of the local kind for a large variety of triangular configurations and compare them with predictions from Eulerian Perturbation Theory up to one-loop corrections. We find that the effects of primordial non-Gaussianity at large scales, when compared to Perturbation Theory, are well described by the initial component of the matter bispectrum, linearly extrapolated at the redshift of interest. In addition, we find that, for f_NL=100, the nonlinear corrections due to non-Gaussian initial conditions are of the order of ~3, 4% for generic triangles up to ~20% for squeezed configurations, at any redshift. We show that the predictions of Perturbation Theory at tree-level fail to describe the simulation results at redshift z=0 already at scales corresponding to k ~ 0.02 - 0.08 h/Mpc, depending on the triangle, while one-loop corrections can significantly extend their validity to smaller scales. At higher redshift, one-loop Perturbation Theory provides indeed quite accurate predictions, particularly with respect to the relative correction due to primordial non-Gaussianity.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.