Paper detail

The mass spectrum of compact remnants from the PARSEC stellar evolution tracks

The mass spectrum of stellar-mass black holes (BHs) is highly uncertain. Dynamical mass measurements are available only for few ($\sim{}10$) BHs in X-ray binaries, while theoretical models strongly depend on the hydrodynamics of supernova (SN) explosions and on the evolution of massive stars. In this paper, we present and discuss the mass spectrum of compact remnants that we obtained with SEVN, a new public population-synthesis code, which couples the PARSEC stellar evolution tracks with up-to-date recipes for SN explosion (depending on the Carbon-Oxygen mass of the progenitor, on the compactness of the stellar core at pre-SN stage, and on a recent two-parameter criterion based on the dimensionless entropy per nucleon at pre-SN stage). SEVN can be used both as a stand-alone code and in combination with direct-summation N-body codes (Starlab, HiGPUs). The PARSEC stellar evolution tracks currently implemented in SEVN predict significantly larger values of the Carbon-Oxygen core mass with respect to previous models. For most of the SN recipes we adopt, this implies substantially larger BH masses at low metallicity ($\leq{}2\times{}10^{-3}$), than other population-synthesis codes. The maximum BH mass found with SEVN is $\sim{}$25, 60 and 130 M$_{\odot}$ at metallicity $Z =2 \times{} 10^{-2}$ , $2 \times{}10^{-3}$ and $2\times{} 10^{-4}$ , respectively. Mass loss by stellar winds plays a major role in determining the mass of BHs for very massive stars ($\geq{}90$ M$_\odot{}$), while the remnant mass spectrum depends mostly on the adopted SN recipe for lower progenitor masses. We discuss the implications of our results for the transition between NS and BH mass, and for the expected number of massive BHs (with mass $>25$ M$_\odot{}$) as a function of metallicity.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.