Paper detail

The Mass-Size Relation and the Constancy of GMC Surface Densities in the Milky Way

We use two existing molecular cloud catalogs derived from the same CO survey and two catalogs derived from local dust extinction surveys to investigate the nature of the GMC mass-size relation in the Galaxy. We find that the four surveys are well described by $M_{GMC} \sim R^2$ implying a constant mean surface density, $Σ_{GMC}$, for the cataloged clouds. However, the scaling coefficients and scatter differ significantly between the CO and extinction derived relations. We find that the additional scatter seen in the CO relations is due to a systematic variation in $Σ_{GMC}$ with Galactic radius that is unobservable in the local extinction data. We decompose this radial variation of $Σ_{GMC}$ into two components, a linear negative gradient with Galactic radius and a broad peak coincident with the molecular ring and superposed on the linear gradient. We show that the former may be due to a radial dependence of X$_{CO}$ on metallicity while the latter likely results from a combination of increased surface densities of individual GMCs and a systematic upward bias in the measurements of $Σ_{GMC}$ due to cloud blending in the molecular ring. We attribute the difference in scaling coefficients between the CO and extinction data to an underestimate of X$_{CO}$. We recalibrate the CO observations of nearby GMCs using extinction measurements to find that locally X$_{CO}$ $=$ 3.6$\pm$0.3 $\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ (K-km/s)$^{-1}$. We conclude that outside the molecular ring the GMC population of the Galaxy can be described to relatively good precision by a constant $Σ_{GMC}$ of 35 M$_\odot$ pc$^{-2}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.