Paper detail

The Mass-Metallicity-SFR Relation at z >~ 2 with 3D-HST

We present new accurate measurements of the physical properties of a statistically significant sample of 103 galaxies at z~2 using near-infrared spectroscopy taken as part of the 3D-HST survey. We derive redshifts, metallicities and star formation rates (SFRs) from the [OII], [OIII] and Hbeta nebular emission lines and exploit the multi-wavelength photometry available in CANDELS to measure stellar masses. We find the mass-metallicity relation (MZR) derived from our data to have the same trend as previous determinations in the range 0<z<3, with lower mass galaxies having lower metallicities. However we find an offset in the relation compared to the previous determination of the z~2 MZR by Erb et al. 2006b, who measure metallicities using the [NII]/Halpha ratio, with metallicities lower at a given mass. Incorporating our SFR information we find that our galaxies are offset from the Fundamental Metallicity Relation (FMR) by ~0.3 dex. We investigate the photoionization conditions and find that our galaxies are consistent with the elevated ionization parameter previously reported in high-redshift galaxies. Using the BPT diagram we argue that, if this is the case, metallicity indicators based on [NII] and Halpha may not be consistent with the ones obtained via oxygen lines and Hbeta. Using a recent determination of the theoretical evolution of the star forming sequence in the BPT diagram we convert our measured [OIII]/Hbeta line ratios to [NII]/Halpha ratios. From the [NII]/Halpha ratio we infer systematically higher metallicities in better agreement with the FMR. Our results thus suggest the evolution of the FMR previously reported at z~2-3 may be an artifact of the differential evolution in metallicity indicators, and caution against using locally calibrated metallicity relations at high redshift which do not account for evolution in the physical conditions of star-forming regions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.