Paper detail

The mass-metallicity relation of SDSS quasars

Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are characterized by a clear correlation between luminosity and metallicity (L_AGN-Z_AGN relation). The origin of this correlation is not clear. It may result from a relation between the black hole mass (M_BH) and metallicity, or from a relation between the accretion rate (L/L_Edd) and metallicity. To investigate the origin of the L_AGN-Z_AGN relation, we use optical spectra of 2383 quasars at 2.3 < z < 3.0 from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. By using this data set, we have constructed composite spectra of 33 subsamples in intervals of both M_BH and L/L_Edd. From these composite spectra we measure emission-line flux ratios that are sensitive to the metallicity of the broad line region (BLR); specifically, NV/CIV, NV/HeII, (SiIV+OIV])/CIV, and AlIII/CIV. We find that there is a significant correlation between M_BH and Z_BLR as inferred from all four metallicity-sensitive emission-line flux ratios. This result strongly suggests that the observed L_AGN-Z_AGN relation is mostly a consequence of the M_BH-Z_AGN relation. The relation between M_BH and Z_BLR is likely a consequence of both the M_BH-M_bul relation and of the mass-metallicity relation in the host galaxy. We also find that L/L_Edd correlates with the emission line flux ratios involving NV (more specifically, NV/CIV and NV/HeII), while it does not correlate with the other two metallicity sensitive emission line flux ratios, i.e., (SiIV+OIV])/CIV and AlIII/CIV. These correlations indicate that the emission-line flux ratios involving NV depend on both metallicity and relative abundance of nitrogen. We suggest that the relation between L/L_Edd and those line ratios involving nitrogen, is caused by a delay of the black hole accretion rate relative to the onset of nuclear star formation of about 10^8 years, which is the timescale required for the nitrogen enrichment.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.