Paper detail

The mass function of nearby black hole candidates

The mass function of super-massive black holes in our cosmic neighborhood is required to understand the statistics of their activity and consequently the origin of the ultra high energy particles. We determine a mass function of black hole candidates from the entire sky except for the Galactic plane. Using the 2MASS catalogue as a starting point, and the well established correlation between black hole mass and the bulge of old population of stars, we derive a list of nearby black hole candidates within the redshift range z < 0.025, then do a further selection based on the Hubble-type, and give this as a catalogue elsewhere. The final list of black hole candidates above a mass of M_BH > 3*10^{6} M_sol has 5,829 entries; moreover doing a further Hubble type correction to account for the selection effects cuts down the number to 2,919 black hole candidates. We also correct for volume, so that this mass function is a volume limited distribution to redshift 0.025 The differential mass function of nearby black hole candidates is a curved function, with a straight simple power-law of index -3 above 10^{8} M_sol, growing progressively flatter towards lower masses, turning off towards a gap below 3*10^{6} M_sol, and then extending into the range where nuclear star clusters replace black holes. The shape of this mass function can be explained in a simple merger picture. Integrating this mass function over the redshift range, from which it has been derived, gives a total number of black holes with z < 0.025, and M_BH > 10^{7} M_sol of about 2.4*10^{4}, or, if we just average uniformly, 0.6 for every square degree on the sky. In different models many of these are candidates for ultra high energy particles sources. If a very small fraction of the super-massive black holes produces ultra high energy cosmic rays, this should be enough to observe the highly inhomogeneous distribution of the galaxies.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.