Paper detail

The MAGPI Survey: co-evolution of baryons and dark matter in star-forming disk-like galaxies at $0.1 \lesssim z \lesssim 0.85$

We present a comprehensive analysis of the dark matter (DM) content and its structural dependence in star-forming disk-like galaxies at intermediate redshifts ($0.1 \lesssim z \lesssim 0.85$), utilizing spatially resolved kinematic data from the MAGPI survey. We report the following: (1) Low stellar mass galaxies ($M_{\rm star} < 10^{9.5}\, M_\odot$) are strongly DM dominated across all radii, with average $\langle f_{_{\rm DM}} \rangle \sim 0.85$, while high-mass ($M_{\rm star} > 10^{10.5}\, M_\odot$) systems exhibit relatively low DM fractions in their inner regions ($\langle f_{_{\rm DM}} \rangle \sim 0.47$) which is equivalent to local massive disk galaxies (e.g., Milky Way and Andromeda). This suggests a mass-dependent structural dichotomy, most-likely governed by a combination of internal galactic processes and environmental influences. (2) A tight inverse correlation between $f_{_{\rm DM}}$ and baryon mass surface density ($Σ_{\rm bar}$), with intrinsic scatter of $\sim 0.11$ dex. This is consistent with an inside-out baryon assembly scenario and suggests that the fundamental structural correlations of galaxies were already established by $z\sim 0.85$. (3) No significant evolution in $f_{_{\rm DM}}$ with redshift across the MAGPI window, and when combined with higher-redshift ($0.6 \leq z \leq 1.5$) data from Sharma et al. 2025, we quantitatively show that the reported decline in $f_{_{\rm DM}}(z)$ is most-likely due to observational biases against low-mass systems at $z > 1$. These results offer empirical evidence for a scenario in which disk-like galaxies evolve through a co-regulated build-up of baryonic and DM components, preserving internal structural regularities (such as the total mass distribution and rotation-curve shape) throughout cosmic time.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access23 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.