Paper detail

The Magnetic Topology of Coronal Mass Ejection sources

In an attempt to test current initiation models of coronal mass ejections (CMEs), with an emphasis on the magnetic breakout model, we inspect the magnetic topology of the sources of 26 CME events in the context of their chromospheric and coronal response in an interval of approximately nine hours around the eruption onset. First, we perform current-free (potential) extrapolations of photospheric magnetograms to retrieve the key topological ingredients, such as coronal magnetic null points. Then we compare the reconnection signatures observed in the high cadence and high spatial resolution of the Transition Region And Coronal Explorer (TRACE) images with the location of the relevant topological features. The comparison reveals that only seven events can be interpreted in terms of the breakout model, which requires a multi-polar topology with pre-eruption reconnection at a coronal null. We find, however, that a larger number of events (twelve) can not be interpreted in those terms. No magnetic null is found in six of them. Seven other cases remain difficult to interpret. We also show that there are no systematic differences between the CME speed and flare energies of events under different interpretations.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.