Paper detail

The MaGICC volume: reproducing statistical properties of high redshift galaxies

We present a cosmological hydrodynamical simulation of a representative volume of the Universe, as part of the Making Galaxies in a Cosmological Context (MaGICC) project. MaGICC uses a thermal implementation for supernova and early stellar feedback. This work tests the feedback model at lower resolution across a range of galaxy masses, morphologies and merger histories. The simulated sample compares well with observations of high redshift galaxies ($z \ge 2$) including the stellar mass - halo mass ($M_\star - M_h$ ) relation, the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function (GSMF) at low masses ($M_\star \lt 5 \times 10^{10} M_\odot$ ) and the number density evolution of low mass galaxies. The poor match of $M_\star - M_h$ and the GSMF at high masses ($M_\star \ge 5 \times 10^{10} M_\odot$ ) indicates supernova feedback is insufficient to limit star formation in these haloes. At $z = 0$, our model produces too many stars in massive galaxies and slightly underpredicts the stellar mass around $L_\star$ mass galaxy. Altogether our results suggest that early stellar feedback, in conjunction with supernovae feedback, plays a major role in regulating the properties of low mass galaxies at high redshift.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.