Paper detail

The M&M Game: From Morsels to Modern Mathematics

To an adult, it's obvious that the day of someone's death is not precisely determined by the day of birth, but it's a very different story for a child. When the third named author was four years old he asked his father, the fifth named author: If two people are born on the same day, do they die on the same day? While this could easily be demonstrated through murder, such a proof would greatly diminish the possibility of teaching additional lessons, and thus a different approach was taken. With the help of the fourth named author they invented what we'll call \emph{the M\&M Game}: Given $k$ people, each simultaneously flips a fair coin, with each eating an M\&M on a head and not eating on a tail. The process then continues until all \mandms\ are consumed, and two people are deemed to die at the same time if they run out of \mandms\ together\footnote{Is one really living without \mandms?}. This led to a great concrete demonstration of randomness appropriate for little kids; it also led to a host of math problems which have been used in probability classes and math competitions. There are many ways to determine the probability of a tie, which allow us in this article to use this problem as a springboard to a lot of great mathematics, including memoryless process, combinatorics, statistical inference, graph theory, and hypergeometric functions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.