Paper detail

The $M_{\bullet} - σ$ relation in spherical systems

To investigate the $M_\bullet -σ$ relation, we consider realistic elliptical galaxy profiles that are taken to follow a single power law density profile given by $ρ(r) = ρ_{0}(r/ r_{0})^{-γ}$ or the Nuker intensity profile. We calculate the density using Abel's formula in the latter case by employing the derived stellar potential in both cases, we derive the distribution function $f(E)$ of the stars in presence of the supermassive black hole (SMBH) at the center and hence compute the line of sight (LOS) velocity dispersion as a function of radius. For the typical range of values for masses of SMBH, we obtain $M_{\bullet} \propto σ^{p}$ for different profiles. An analytical relation $p = (2γ+ 6)/(2 + γ)$ is found which is in reasonable agreement with observations (for $γ$ = 0.75 - 1.4, $p$ = 3.6 - 5.3). Assuming that a proportionality relation holds between the black hole mass and bulge mass, $ M_{\bullet} =f M_b$, and applying this to several galaxies we find the individual best fit values of $p$ as a function of $f$; also by minimizing $χ^{2}$, we find the best fit global $p$ and $f$. For Nuker profiles we find that $p$ = $3.81 \pm 0.004$ and $f$ = $(1.23 \pm 0.09)\times 10^{-3}$ which are consistent with the observed ranges.

preprint2017arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.