Paper detail

The Luminosity Profile and Structural Parameters of the Andromeda Galaxy

We have constructed an extended composite luminosity profile for the Andromeda galaxy, M31, and have decomposed it into three basic luminous structural components: a bulge, a disk and a halo. The dust-free Spitzer/IRAC imaging and extended spatial coverage of ground-based optical imaging and deep star counts allow us to map M31&#39;s structure from its center to 22 kpc along the major axis. We apply different decomposition methods for the 1D luminosity profiles and 2D images. These include non-linear least-squares and Bayesian Monte-Carlo Markov-chain analyses. The basic photometric model for M31 has a Sersic bulge with shape index n = 2.2 +/- 0.3 and effective radius R_e = 1.0 +/- 0.2 kpc, a dust-free exponential disk of scale length R_d = 5.3 +/- 0.5 kpc; the parameter errors reflect the range between various decomposition methods. The bulge parameter, n, is rather insensitive to bandpass effects and its value suggests a first rapid formation via mergers followed by secular growth from the disk. The M31 halo has a 2D power-law index ~ -2.5 +/- 0.2. We find that the M31 bulge light is mostly dominant over the range R_minor < 1.2 kpc. The disk takes over in the range 1.2 kpc < R_minor < 9 kpc, whereas the halo dominates at R_minor > 9 kpc. The stellar nucleus, bulge, disk, and halo components each contribute roughly 0.05%, 23%, 73% and 4% of the total light of M31 out to 200 kpc along the minor axis. Nominal errors for the structural parameters of the M31 bulge, disk and halo amount to 20%. If M31 and the Milky Way are at all typical, faint stellar halos should be routinely detected in galaxy surveys reaching below mu_i ~ 27 mag/arcsec^2. We stress that our results rely on this photometric analysis alone. Structural parameters may change when other fundamental constraints, such as those provided by abundance gradients and stellar kinematics, are considered simultaneously (Abridged).

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.