Paper detail

The Luminosity Function of Star Clusters in 20 Star-Forming Galaxies Based on Hubble Legacy Archive Photometry

Luminosity functions have been determined for star cluster populations in 20 nearby (4-30 Mpc), star-forming galaxies based on ACS source lists generated by the Hubble Legacy Archive. Comparisons are made with other recently generated cluster catalogs demonstrating that the HLA-generated catalogs are of similar quality, but in general do not go as deep. A typical cluster luminosity function can be approximated by a power-law, $dN/dL\propto L^α$, with an average value for $α$ of $-2.37$ and RMS scatter = 0.18 when using the F814W ("$I$") band. We find that galaxies with high rates of star formation (or equivalently, with the brightest or largest numbers of clusters) have a slight tendency to have shallower values of $α$. In particular, the Antennae galaxy (NGC4038/39), a merging system with a relatively high star formation rate, has the second flattest luminosity function in the sample. A tentative correlation may also be present between Hubble Type and values of $α$, in the sense that later type galaxies (i.e., Sd and Sm) appear to have flatter luminosity functions. Hence, while there do appear to be some weak correlations, the relative similarity in the values of $α$ for a large number of star-forming galaxies suggests that, to first order, the LFs are fairly universal. We examine the bright end of the luminosity functions and find evidence for a downturn, although it only pertains to about 1% of the clusters. Our uniform database results in a small scatter ($\approx$0.4 to 0.5 mag) in the correlation between the magnitude of the brightest cluster ($M_\mathrm{brightest}$) and log of the number of clusters brighter than $M_{I}=-9$ (log N). We also examine the magnitude of the brightest cluster vs. log SFR for a sample including both dwarfs galaxies and ULIRGS.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.