Paper detail

The luminosity function and the rate of Swift's Gamma Ray Bursts

We invert directly the redshift - luminosity distribution of observed long Swift GRBs to obtain their rate and luminosity function. Our best fit rate is described by a broken power law that rises like (1+z)^2.1{+0.5-0.6} for 0<z<3 and decrease like (1+z)^-1.4{+2.4-1.0} for z>3. The local rate is 1.3^{+0.6-0.7} [Gpc^-3 yr^-1]. The luminosity function is well described by a broken power law with a break at L* = 10^52.5{+-0.2}[erg/sec] and with indices alpha = 0.2^{+0.2-0.1} and beta = 1.4^{+0.3-0.6}. The recently detected GRB 090423, with redshift ~8, fits nicely into the model's prediction, verifying that we are allowed to extend our results to high redshifts. While there is a possible agreement with the star formation rate (SFR) for z<3, the high redshift slope is shallower than the steep decline in the SFR for 4<z. However we cannot rule out a GRB rate that follows one of the recent SFR models.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.