Paper detail

The lower limits of disc fragmentation and the prospects for observing fragmenting discs

A large fraction of brown dwarfs and low-mass H-burning stars may form by gravitational fragmentation of protostellar discs. We explore the conditions for disc fragmentation and we find that they are satisfied when a disc is large enough (>100 AU) so that its outer regions can cool efficiently, and it has enough mass to be gravitationally unstable, at such radii. We perform radiative hydrodynamic simulations and show that even a disc with mass 0.25 Msun and size 100 AU fragments. The disc mass, radius, and the ratio of disc-to-star mass (Mdisc/Mstar~0.36) are smaller than in previous studies. We find that fragmenting discs decrease in mass and size within a few 10^4 yr of their formation, since a fraction of their mass, especially outside 100 AU is consumed by the new stars and brown dwarfs that form. Fragmenting discs end up with masses ~0.001-0.1 Msun, and sizes ~20-100 AU. On the other hand, discs that are marginally stable live much longer. We produce simulated images of fragmenting discs and find that observing discs that are undergoing fragmentation is possible using current (e.g. IRAM-PdBI) and future (e.g. ALMA) interferometers, but highly improbable due to the short duration of this process. Comparison with observations shows that many observed discs may be remnants of discs that have fragmented at an earlier stage. However, there are only a few candidates that are possibly massive and large enough to currently be gravitationally unstable. The rarity of massive (>0.2 Msun), extended (>100 AU) discs indicates either that such discs are highly transient (i.e. form, increase in mass becoming gravitationally unstable due to infall of material from the surrounding envelope, and quickly fragment), or that their formation is suppressed (e.g. by magnetic fields). We conclude that current observations of early-stage discs cannot exclude the mechanism of disc fragmentation.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.