Paper detail

The Low-Temperature Nucleation Rate Anomaly in Silicate Glasses is an Artifact

Over the past 40 years measurements of the nucleation rates in a large number of silicate glasses have indicated a breakdown in the widely used Classical Nucleation Theory (CNT) for temperatures below that of the peak nucleation rate. The data show that instead of steadily decreasing with decreasing temperature, the work of critical cluster formation enters a plateau, and even starts to increase. While many explanations have been offered to explain this anomaly, none have provided a satisfactory answer. We present the first experimental results that demonstrate that the anomaly is not real, but is instead an artifact arising from an insufficient annealing time at the low temperatures. The time-dependent nucleation rate was measured in a 5BaO.8SiO2 glass at a temperature 50 K below the peak nucleation rate temperature for a time many times longer than any previous measurement time for a silicate glass. The new data give results that are consistent with the predictions of the CNT. Since the artifact has been widely observed in many silicate glasses, these results indicate that much of the existing nucleation rate data at low temperatures are incorrect.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.