Paper detail

The low-mass interacting binary system OO Aql revisited: a new quadruple system

In this study we present photometric and spectroscopic variation analysis and orbital period study of a low-mass interacting system OO Aql. Simultaneous solution of the light and radial velocity curves provide us a determination of new set of stellar physical parameters for the primary and the secondary companion as M$_{1}$ = 1.05(2) M$_{\odot}$, M$_{2}$ = 0.89(2) M$_{\odot}$, R$_{1}$ = 1.38(2) R$_{\odot}$, R$_{2}$ = 1.28(2) R$_{\odot}$, $\log{(L_1/L_{\odot})} = 0.258$ and $\log{(L_2/L_{\odot})} = 0.117$ and the separation of the components were determined a = 3.333(16) R$_{\odot}$. Newly obtained parameters yield the distance of the system as 136(8) pc. Analyses of the mid-eclipse times indicate a period increase of $\frac{P}{\dot{P}}=4\times 10^{7}$ yr that can be interpreted in terms of the mass transfer $\frac{dM}{dt}=5\times 10^{-8}$ M$_{\odot}$/yr from the less massive component to the more massive component. Our new solution confirmed that OO Aql is a multiple system in the form of AB + C + D. We found initial astrophysical parameters for the component of the system and its current age to be 8.6 Gyr using nonconservative stellar evolution model (EV-TWIN code).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.