Paper detail

The low-mass end of the Mbh/Mhost relation in quasars

The Mbh-Mhost relation in quasars has been probed only in a limited parameter space, namely at Mbh~10^9 Msun and Mhost~10^12 Msun. Here we present a study of 26 quasars lying in the low-mass end of the relation, down to Mbh~10^7 Msun. We selected quasars from the SDSS and HST-FOS archives, requiring modest Mbh (as derived through the virial paradigm). We imaged our sources in H band from the Nordic Optical Telescope. The quasar host galaxies have been resolved in 25 out of 26 observed targets. Host galaxy luminosities and stellar masses are computed, under reasonable assumptions on their star formation histories. Combining these results with those from our previous studies, we manage to extend the sampled parameter space of the Mbh-Mhost relation in quasars. The relation holds over 2 dex in both the parameters, similarly to what observed in low-luminosity AGN and in quiescent galaxies. For the first time, we are able to measure the slope of the Mbh-Mhost relation in quasars. We find that it is consistent with the linear case (similarly to what observed in quiescent galaxies). We do not find any evidence of a population of massive black holes lying below the relation.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.