Paper detail

The Low End of the Supermassive Black Hole Mass Function: Constraining the Mass of a Nuclear Black Hole in NGC 205 via Stellar Kinematics

Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images and spectra of the nucleated dwarf elliptical galaxy NGC 205 are combined with 3-integral axisymmetric dynamical models to constrain the mass (M_BH) of a putative nuclear black hole. This is only the second attempt, after M33, to use resolved stellar kinematics to search for a nuclear black hole with mass below 10^6 solar masses. We are unable to identify a best-fit value of M_BH in NGC 205; however, the data impose a upper limit of 2.2x10^4 M_sun (1sigma confidence) and and upper limit of 3.8x10^4 M_sun (3sigma confidence). This upper limit is consistent with the extrapolation of the M_BH-sigma relation to the M_BH < 10^6 M_sunregime. If we assume that NGC 205 and M33 both contain nuclear black holes, the upper limits on M_BH in the two galaxies imply a slope of ~5.5 or greater for the M_BH-sigma relation. We use our 3-integral models to evaluate the relaxation time (T_r) and stellar collision time (T_coll) in NGC 205; T_r~10^8 yr or less in the nucleus and T_coll~10^11 yr. The low value of T_r is consistent with core collapse having already occurred, but we are unable to draw conclusions from nuclear morphology about the presence or absence of a massive black hole.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.