Paper detail

The loss-cone problem in dense nuclei

We address the classical problem of star accretion onto a supermassive central gaseous object in a galactic nucleus. The resulting supermassive central gas-star object is assumed to be located at the centre of a dense stellar system for which we use a simplified model consisting of a Plummer model with an embedded density cusp using stellar point masses. From the number of stars belonging to the loss-cone, which plunge onto the central object on elongated orbits from outside, we estimate the accretion rate taking into account a possible anisotropy of the surrounding stellar distribution. The total heating rate in the supermassive star due to the loss-cone stars plunging onto it is estimated. This semi-analytical study, revisiting and expanding classical paper's work, is a starting point of future work on a more detailed study of early evolutionary phases of galactic nuclei. It merits closer examination, because it is one of the key features for the link between cosmology and galaxy formation.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.