Paper detail

The long-term evolution of neutron star merger remnants - II. Radioactively powered transients

We use 3D hydrodynamic simulations of the long-term evolution of neutron star merger ejecta to predict the light curves of electromagnetic transients that are powered by the decay of freshly produced r-process nuclei. For the dynamic ejecta that are launched by tidal and hydrodynamic interaction, we adopt grey opacities of 10 cm$^2$/g, as suggested by recent studies. For our reference case of a 1.3-1.4 $M_\odot$ merger, we find a broad IR peak 2-4 d after the merger. The peak luminosity is $\approx 2\times 10^{40}$ erg/s for an average orientation, but increased by up to a factor of 4 for more favourable binary parameters and viewing angles. These signals are rather weak and hardly detectable within the large error box (~100 deg$^2$) of a gravitational wave trigger. A second electromagnetic transient results from neutrino-driven winds. These winds produce `weak' r-process material with $50 < A < 130$ and abundance patterns that vary substantially between different merger cases. For an adopted opacity of 1 cm$^2$/g, the resulting transients peak in the UV/optical about 6 h after the merger with a luminosity of $\approx 10^{41}$ erg/s (for a wind of 0.01 $M_\odot$) These signals are marginally detectable in deep follow-up searches (e.g. using Hypersuprime camera on Subaru). A subsequent detection of the weaker but longer lasting IR signal would allow an identification of the merger event. We briefly discuss the implications of our results to the recent detection of an nIR transient accompanying GRB 130603B.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.