Paper detail

The Long Tails of the Pegasus-Pisces Arch Intermediate Velocity Cloud

We present hydrodynamic simulations of the Pegasus-Pisces (PP Arch), an intermediate velocity cloud in our Galaxy. The PP Arch, also known as IVC 86-36, is unique among intermediate and high velocity clouds, because its twin tails are unusually long and narrow. Its -50 km/s line-of-sight velocity qualifies it as an intermediate velocity cloud, but the tails' orientations indicate that the cloud's total three-dimensional speed is at least ~100 km/s. This speed is supersonic in the Reynold's Layer and thick disk. We simulated the cloud as it travels supersonically through the Galactic thick and thin disks at an oblique angle relative to the midplane. Our simulated clouds grow long double tails and reasonably reproduce the H I 21~cm intensity and velocity of the head of the PP Arch. A bow shock protects each simulated cloud from excessive shear and lowers its Reynolds number. These factors may similarly protect the PP Arch and enable the survival of its unusually long tails. The simulations predict the future hydrodynamic behavior of the cloud when it collides with denser gas nearer to the Galactic midplane. It appears that the PP Arch's fate is to deform, dissipate, and merge with the Galactic disk.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.