Paper detail

The Local Hole in the Galaxy Distribution: New Optical Evidence

We present a new CCD survey of galaxies within the N and S strips of the 2dFGRS areas. We use the new CCD data to check the photographic photometry scales of the 2dFGRS, APMBGC, APM-Stromlo Redshift Survey, Durham-UKST (DUKST) survey, Millenium Galaxy Catalogue (MGC) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We find evidence for scale and zero-point errors in the 2dFGRS northern field, DUKST and APM data of 0.10, 0.24 and 0.31 mag. respectively; we find excellent agreement with the MGC and SDSS photometry. We find conclusive evidence that the S counts with B<17 mag are down by ~30% relative to both the N counts and to the models of Metcalfe et al. We further compare the n(z) distributions from the B<17 mag. DUKST and B<19.5 2dFGRS redshift surveys using the corrected photometry. While the N n(z) from 2dFGRS appears relatively homogeneous over its whole range, the S n(z) shows a 30% deficiency out to z=0.1; at higher redshifts it agrees much better with the N n(z) and the homogeneous model n(z). The DUKST n(z) shows that the S `hole' extends over a 20 by 75 degree squared area. The troughs with z<0.1 in the DUKST n(z) appear deeper than for the fainter 2dFGRS data. This may be evidence that the local galaxy distribution is biased on >50 h-1 Mpc scales which is unexpected in a Lambda-CDM cosmology. Finally, since the Southern local void persists over the full area of the APM and APMBGC with a ~25% deficiency in the counts below B~17, this means that its extent is ~300 h-1 Mpc by 300 h-1 Mpc on the sky as well as ~300 h-1 Mpc in the redshift direction. Such a 25% deficiency extending over ~10^7 h-3 Mpc^3 may imply that the galaxy correlation function's power-law behaviour extends to \~150 h-1 Mpc with no break and show more excess large-scale power than detected in the 2dFGRS correlation function or expected in the Lambda-CDM cosmology.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.