Paper detail

The Local Hole: a galaxy under-density covering 90% of sky to ~200 Mpc

We investigate the `Local Hole', an anomalous under-density in the local galaxy environment, by extending our previous galaxy $K-$band number-redshift and number-magnitude counts to $\approx 90\%$ of the sky. Our redshift samples are taken from the 2MASS Redshift Survey (2MRS) and the 2M++ catalogues, limited to $K<11.5$. We find that both surveys are in good agreement, showing an $\approx 21-22\%$ under-density at $z<0.075$ when compared to our homogeneous counts model that assumes the same luminosity function and other parameters as in our earlier papers. Using the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) for $n(K)$ galaxy counts, we measure an under-density relative to this model of $20\pm 2 \%$ at $K<11.5$, which is consistent in both form and scale with the observed $n(z)$ under-density. To examine further the accuracy of the counts model, we compare its prediction for the fainter $n(K)$ counts of the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. We further compare these data with a model assuming the parameters of a previous study where little evidence for the Local Hole was found. At $13<K<16$ we find a significantly better fit for our model, arguing for our higher luminosity function normalisation. Although our implied under-density of $\approx 20\%$ means local measurements of the Hubble Constant have been over-estimated by $\approx3$\%, such a scale of under-density is in tension with a global $Λ$CDM cosmology at an $\approx3σ$ level.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.