Paper detail

The Local Group as a test of cosmological models

The dynamics of the Local Group and its environment provide a unique challenge to cosmological models. The velocity field within 5h-1 Mpc of the Local Group (LG) is extremely ``cold''. The deviation from a pure Hubble flow, characterized by the observed radial peculiar velocity dispersion, is measured to be about 60km/s. We compare the local velocity field with similarly defined regions extracted from N-body simulations of Universes dominated by cold dark matter (CDM). This test is able to strongly discriminate between models that have different mean mass densities. We find that neither the Omega=1 (SCDM) nor Omega=0.3 (OCDM) cold dark matter models can produce a single candidate Local Group that is embedded in a region with such small peculiar velocities. For these models, we measure velocity dispersions between 500-700km/s and 150-300km/s respectively, more than twice the observed value. Although both CDM models fail to produce environments similar to those of our Local Group on a scale of a few Mpc, they can give rise to many binary systems that have similar orbital properties as the Milky Way--Andromeda system. The local, gravitationally induced bias of halos in the CDM ``Local Group'' environment, if defined within a sphere of 10 Mpc around each Local Group is about 1.5, independent of Omega. No biasing scheme could reconcile the measured velocity dispersions around Local Groups with the observed one. Identification of binary systems using a halo finder (named Skid (http://www-hpcc.astro.washington.edu/tools/DENMAX for a public version)) based on local density maxima instead of a simple linking algorithm, gives a much more complete sample. We show that a standard ``friend of friends'' algorithm would miss 40% of the LG candidates present in the simulations.

preprint1996arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.