Paper detail

The link between molecular cloud structure and turbulence

We aim to better understand how the spatial structure of molecular clouds is governed by turbulence. For that, we study the large-scale spatial distribution of low density molecular gas and search for characteristic length scales. We employ a 35 square degrees 13CO 1-0 molecular line survey of Cygnus X and visual extinction (A_V) maps of 17 Galactic clouds to analyse the spatial structure using the Delta-variance method. This sample contains a large variety of different molecular cloud types with different star forming activity. The Delta-variance spectra obtained from the A_V maps show differences between low-mass star-forming (SF) clouds and massive giant molecular clouds (GMC) in terms of shape of the spectrum and its power-law exponent beta. Low-mass SF clouds have a double-peak structure with characteristic size scales around 1 pc (though with a large scatter around this value) and 4 pc. GMCs show no characteristic scale in the A_V-maps, which can partly be ascribed to a distance effect due to a larger line-of-sight (LOS) confusion. The Delta-variance for Cygnus, determined from the 13CO survey, shows characteristic scales at 4 pc and 40 pc, either reflecting the filament structure and large-scale turbulence forcing or - for the 4 pc scale - the scale below which the 13CO 1-0 line becomes optically thick. Though there are different processes that can introduce characteristic scales, i.e. geometry, decaying turbulence the transition scale from supersonic to subsonic turbulence (the sonic scale), line-of-sight effects and energy injection due to expanding supernova shells, outflows, HII-regions, and the relative contribution of these effects strongly varies from cloud to cloud, it is remarkable that the resulting turbulent structure of molecular clouds shows similar characteristics.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.