Paper detail

The linearization methods as a basis to derive the relaxation and the shooting methods

This chapter investigates numerical solution of nonlinear two-point boundary value problems. It establishes a connection between three important, seemingly unrelated, classes of iterative methods, namely: the linearization methods, the relaxation methods (finite difference methods), and the shooting methods. It has recently been demonstrated that using finite differences to discretize the sequence of linear problems obtained by quasi-linearization, Picard linearization, or constant-slope linearization, leads to the usual iteration formula of the respective relaxation method. Thus, the linearization methods can be used as a basis to derive the relaxation methods. In this work we demonstrate that the shooting methods can be derived from the linearization methods, too. We show that relaxing a shooting trajectory, i.e. an initial value problem solution, is in fact a projection transformation. The obtained function, called projection trajectory, can be used to correct the initial condition. Using the new initial condition, we can find a new shooting trajectory, and so on. The described procedure is called shooting-projection iteration (SPI). We show that using the quasi-linearization equation to relax (project) the shooting trajectory leads to the usual shooting by Newton method, the constant-slope linearization leads to the usual shooting by constant-slope method, while the Picard linearization leads to the recently proposed shooting-projection method. Therefore, the latter method can rightfully be called shooting by Picard method. A possible application of the new theoretical results is suggested and numerical computer experiments are presented. MATLAB codes are provided.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.