Paper detail

The linear refinement number and selection theory

The \emph{linear refinement number} $\mathfrak{lr}$ is the minimal cardinality of a centered family in $[ω]^ω$ such that no linearly ordered set in $([ω]^ω,\subseteq^*)$ refines this family. The \emph{linear excluded middle number} $\mathfrak{lx}$ is a variation of $\mathfrak{lr}$. We show that these numbers estimate the critical cardinalities of a number of selective covering properties. We compare these numbers to the classic combinatorial cardinal characteristics of the continuum. We prove that $\mathfrak{lr}=\mathfrak{lx}=\mathfrak{fd}$ in all models where the continuum is at most $\aleph_2$, and that the cofinality of $\mathfrak{lr}$ is uncountable. Using the method of forcing, we show that $\mathfrak{lr}$ and $\mathfrak{lx}$ are not provably equal to $\mathfrak{d}$, and rule out several potential bounds on these numbers. Our results solve a number of open problems.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.