Paper detail

The limitations of the Poincar{é} inequality

We examine the validity of the Poincaré inequality for degenerate, second-order, elliptic operators $H$ in divergence form on $L_2(\Ri^{n}\times\Ri^{m})$. We assume the coefficients are real symmetric and $a_1H_δ\geq H\geq a_2H_δ$ for some $a_1,a_2>0$ where $H_δ$ is a generalized Grušin operator, \[ H_δ=-\nabla_{x_1}\,|x_1|^{(2δ_1,2δ_1')}\,\nabla_{x_1}-|x_1|^{(2δ_2,2δ_2')}\,\nabla_{x_2}^2 \;. \] Here $x_1\in\Ri^n$, $x_2\in\Ri^m$, $δ_1,δ_1'\in[0,1\rangle$, $δ_2,δ_2'\geq0$ and $|x_1|^{(2δ,2δ')}=|x_1|^{2δ}$ if $|x_1|\leq 1$ and $|x_1|^{(2δ,2δ')}=|x_1|^{2δ'}$ if $|x_1|\geq 1$. \smallskip We prove that the Poincaré inequality, formulated in terms of the Riemannian geometry corresponding to $H$, is valid if $n\geq 2$, or if $n=1$ and $δ_1\veeδ_1'\in[0,1/2\rangle$ but it fails if $n=1$ and $δ_1\veeδ_1'\in[1/2,1\rangle$. The failure is caused by the leading term. If $δ_1\in[1/2, 1\rangle$ it is an effect of the local degeneracy $|x_1|^{2δ_1}$ but if $δ_1\in[0, 1/2\rangle$ and $δ_1'\in [1/2,1\rangle$ it is an effect of the growth at infinity of $|x_1|^{2δ_1'}$. If $n=1$ and $δ_1\in[1/2, 1\rangle$ then the semigroup $S$ generated by the Friedrichs' extension of $H$ is not ergodic. The subspaces $x_1\geq 0$ and $x_1\leq 0$ are $S$-invariant and the Poincaré inequality is valid on each of these subspaces. If, however, $n=1$, $δ_1\in[0, 1/2\rangle$ and $δ_1'\in [1/2,1\rangle$ then the semigroup $S$ is ergodic but the Poincaré inequality is only valid locally. \smallskip Finally we discuss the implication of these results for the kernel of the semigroup $S$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.