The limitations of the Poincar{é} inequality

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Abstract

We examine the validity of the Poincaré inequality for degenerate, second-order, elliptic operators HH in divergence form on $L_2(\Ri^{n}\times\Ri^{m})$. We assume the coefficients are real symmetric and a1Hδ≥H≥a2Hδa_1H_δ\geq H\geq a_2H_δ for some a1,a2>0a_1,a_2>0 where HδH_δ is a generalized Grušin operator, Hδ=−∇x1 ∣x1∣(2δ1,2δ1′) ∇x1−∣x1∣(2δ2,2δ2′) ∇x22  . H_δ=-\nabla_{x_1}\,|x_1|^{(2δ_1,2δ_1')}\,\nabla_{x_1}-|x_1|^{(2δ_2,2δ_2')}\,\nabla_{x_2}^2 \;. Here $x_1\in\Ri^n$, $x_2\in\Ri^m$, δ1,δ1′∈[0,1⟩δ_1,δ_1'\in[0,1\rangle, δ2,δ2′≥0δ_2,δ_2'\geq0 and ∣x1∣(2δ,2δ′)=∣x1∣2δ|x_1|^{(2δ,2δ')}=|x_1|^{2δ} if ∣x1∣≤1|x_1|\leq 1 and ∣x1∣(2δ,2δ′)=∣x1∣2δ′|x_1|^{(2δ,2δ')}=|x_1|^{2δ'} if ∣x1∣≥1|x_1|\geq 1. \smallskip We prove that the Poincaré inequality, formulated in terms of the Riemannian geometry corresponding to HH, is valid if n≥2n\geq 2, or if n=1n=1 and δ1∨δ1′∈[0,1/2⟩δ_1\veeδ_1'\in[0,1/2\rangle but it fails if n=1n=1 and δ1∨δ1′∈[1/2,1⟩δ_1\veeδ_1'\in[1/2,1\rangle. The failure is caused by the leading term. If δ1∈[1/2,1⟩δ_1\in[1/2, 1\rangle it is an effect of the local degeneracy ∣x1∣2δ1|x_1|^{2δ_1} but if δ1∈[0,1/2⟩δ_1\in[0, 1/2\rangle and δ1′∈[1/2,1⟩δ_1'\in [1/2,1\rangle it is an effect of the growth at infinity of ∣x1∣2δ1′|x_1|^{2δ_1'}. If n=1n=1 and δ1∈[1/2,1⟩δ_1\in[1/2, 1\rangle then the semigroup SS generated by the Friedrichs' extension of HH is not ergodic. The subspaces x1≥0x_1\geq 0 and x1≤0x_1\leq 0 are SS-invariant and the Poincaré inequality is valid on each of these subspaces. If, however, n=1n=1, δ1∈[0,1/2⟩δ_1\in[0, 1/2\rangle and δ1′∈[1/2,1⟩δ_1'\in [1/2,1\rangle then the semigroup SS is ergodic but the Poincaré inequality is only valid locally. \smallskip Finally we discuss the implication of these results for the kernel of the semigroup SS.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.